Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 104 of 427
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1280
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P-024/2021- Christava Mahilalayam HSS-Order 03-08-2021

Download 
Download
The tariff category of self-financing educational institutions was LT VIA prior to 01-12-2007 and which was changed to LT VIIA with effect from 01-12-2007. KSEB Ltd. raised a total demand of Rs.85,187/- towards the difference between the tariff LT VIA and LT VIIA. Later, as advised by KSEB Ltd. for a one-time settlement, the appellant remitted the entire principal amount of Rs.85,187/- along with the surcharge for Rs.47,659/-. The decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court came on 20-02-2020 and based on the judgment, KSEB Ltd. has no right to recover any arrear amount since the entire amount was remitted in 2018 under one time settlement scheme. On 23-12-2020, the appellant was given another bill for Rs.2,58,042/- along with surcharge for Rs.4,35,563/- in the consumer numbers towards the difference between LT VIA & LT VIIA for the period from 02/2010 to 05/2013 stating that the amount remitted in the year 2018 was the difference in tariff from 12/2007 to 02/2010. As such the appellant is not liable to remit the bill amount and this was not raised by the respondent in the year 2018. In the version filed by the respondent, it is stated that the appellant availed the benefit of one-time settlement scheme on 31-03-2021 and the surcharge was revised from Rs.4,35,563/- to Rs.1,46,399/-. The hearing of the case was scheduled on 21-05-2021 but the appellant informed that they availed the facility of one-time settlement scheme of KSEB Ltd. and the appeal petition is withdrawn by the appellant. Later the respondent informed that the appellant had remitted arrear amount under “One Time Scheme” in respect of consumer numbers 52 and 94 respectively on 31-03-2021. As such the appeal petition No. P-024/2021 filed by the appellant is closed.
P-007/2021-Sri. G. Padmakumar, Kollam-Order 03-08-2021

Download 
Download
The service connection had been given for running “Capital Colour Park”, functioning as a unit for photo designing, digital printing under LT IVA tariff. As per tariff category revision, the appellant’s premises was reassigned LT VII A tariff. The Assistant Executive Engineer inspected the premises after getting a complaint from the appellant on the tariff change and retained the tariff under category LT IVA by the respondent. Later on, the premises was inspected by APTS of KSEB Ltd. and again changed the tariff category from LT IVA to LT VIIA. Also, the respondent issued a short assessment bill for Rs.1,54,711/- towards the difference in tariff categories. Against the action of KSEB Ltd. the appellant filed a petition before (CGRF), Southern Region, and the dismissed the petition allowing instalment facility. Appellant filed appeal petition before this Authority. Since the subject of tariff category classification is presented before the Hon’ble Kerala State Electricity Regulatory Commission, the empowered body for the determination of tariff rate and tariff category, the revision is subjected to the decision of the Hon’ble Commission. The order of CGRF, Southern Region in OP No. 44/2020 dated 03-11-2020 is set aside.
P-018/2021-Sri. B.R. Jose, Thrissur-Order 23-07-2021

Download 
Download
A three phase LT electric line is crossing the property of the appellant and the line extends beyond the property and already provided an electric connection from the extended line to one Sri. Praveen Antony. The appellant approached the Licensee for shifting the line from his property and the Executive Engineer intimated the appellant that the line can be shifted under deposit work basis. Further, the appellant filed a petition before CGRF for the same purpose. The respondent prepared two proposals for shifting the line. The CGRF in its order says, “The line shall be shifted on remittance of the estimate amount under deposit work scheme by the petitioner in accordance with Regulation 95 of Electricity Supply Code 2014”. Aggrieved by the decision of the Forum, the appellant filed appeal petition. The appellant’s plea to exempt from remitting the expense for the shifting of the electric line is rejected and this Authority modified the decision taken by the CGRF, Central Region in OP No. 56/2020-21 dated 24-02-2021. The appellant can opt any technically feasible route proposed by the respondent and the appellant shall remit the expense for the shifting of the line.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday266
mod_vvisit_counterAll5338898