Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 35 of 422
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1265
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/018/2023- Shri. Rajagopal K.G

Download 
Download
The appellant Shri. KG Rajagopal is a consumer of the licensee (KSEBL)in Edappally electrical section with connected load 6kw in LT 7A tariff. the connection is availed for a small fabrication workshop. The consumer was not paying the electricity charges since May 2021. the consumer was not paying the charges. the power was disconnected on 5/02/2022. The service connection was dismantled on 29/12/2022. the total outstanding after adjusting the security deposit was Rs. 24,236/-. This amount includes regular current charges and the surcharge. The action has been initiated by the licensee for the revenue recovery procedure for recovering the arrears. The appellant filed petition to CGRF and CGRF issued order dated 28/2/2023 stating that the power disconnection as per Section 139 of Kerala electricity supply code 2014 has not been followed and respondent shall revise the demand for 180 days as per regulation 141 of Kerala State Electricity Supply Code 2014. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, the petition is filed to this authority. On verifying the documents submitted and hearing both the petitioner and respondent and also from the analysis as mentioned above, the following decision are hereby taken. 1. The licensee has to charge fixed charges only for six months from the date of disconnection. 2. The licensee has to revise the demand as per (1) above. 3. The appellant is liable to pay the charges as per the revised demand. The demand notice should be in detail mentioning various outstanding amounts. 4. No order on cost
P/017/2023- Shri. Pro: M. J. Jacob

Download 
Download
The appellant is an HT consumer of licensee (KSEBL) with consumer number 1356180002963 with connected load of 420 kw. The appellant is the president of Thodupuzha Taluk Co-operative Rubber Marketing Society Ltd. The premises of TTCRMS has been leased out to Shri. Bobby Issac Mathew and presently operates by Sri. Baby Isacc Mathew. The appellant is a regular defaulter of monthly current charge. The rebate declared by the state Govt. during the Covid-19 period has been extended to the appellant. The arrears pending from the appellant is around Rs. 42, 80, 214/-. The power charge default is since 2015 onwards, billed amount was not fully paid and each bill there were outstanding and this attracted interest also. The appellant approached the CGRF and CGRF ordered vide order dated 25/02/2023, that the appellant is liable to pay the arrear bill and also granted 12 instalment facility to clear the payment. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, the appellant filed this appeal petition to the authority. On verifying the documents submitted and hearing both the petitioner and respondent and also from the analysis as mentioned above, the following decision are hereby taken. 1. The appellant is liable to pay the amount as per the demand of Licensee. 2. The appellant has to remit a minimum amount of Rs. 15 Lakhs within 15 days and for the balance amount licensee shall grant 24 monthly instalments. 3. The enhancement of connected load shall be granted as per Section 99 of the Kerala Electricity Supply Code -2014. 4. No order on cost.
P/016/2023- Shri. M. A. Jose

Download 
Download
The appellant Shri. M. A Jose is a consumer of the licensee (KSEB) under Paika electrical section with consumer no. 1156268000317 under LT 1A tariff. The service line for his connection is drawn through his property. Some trees grown and were touching the service line. These touching were removed by the KSEB. The branches of the rubber trees which were planted 6 feet away from the line and 6-year-old were removed and the trees were damaged. When the officials of the licensee have attended the replacement of the broken service line, they again damaged Cacao tree which were grown about 4 feet calculating the yield of the trees which were damaged, the appellant is to be compensated by the licensee and the claim made is Rs. 60,000/-. KSEB has rejected their claim stating that KSEB is not having the provision of paying the compensation for the removal of touching. The appellant filed petition to CGRF, and CGRF ordered that the CGRF is not competent to award compensation as demanded by the petitioner. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, the appellant filed this appeal petition to the authority. Decision. On verifying the documents submitted and hearing both the petitioner and respondent and also from the analysis as mentioned above, the following decision are hereby taken. 1. This authority is not competent to take decision on payment of competition. 2. Appellant may take up to the competent authority to take decision on the demand of compensation. 3. The case is disposed. 4. No order on cost.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday1402
mod_vvisit_counterAll5088322