Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 167 of 427
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1280
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/082/2018 - Sri. Joseph A.G,. Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant has filed an appeal petition in P/082/2018, being aggrieved at the inaction of KSEBL, Electrical Section, Palarivattom to shift the electric posts situated in the pathway of the building owned by the appellant to the nearby compound wall. The appellant finds difficulty to free assess of vehicular traffic to his property. Though the appellant had approached the KSEBL for shifting the posts, they had prepared an estimate and remitted the required amounts on 15-03-2017. The appellant has filed petition before the CGRF, Ernakulam vide Petition No. OP No. 16/2018-19 and the CGRF has disposed it by order dated 29-09-2018 as follows: "(1) If the petitioner desires to shift the electric post and line for increasing the front area of the shop and house to feasible route proposed by the respondent, the willingness shall be submitted to the Assistant Engineer office on or before 8-10-2018. (2) 1f the petitioner is not willing to accept the feasible proposal proposed by the respondent, the respondent shall take up the matter with Honourable District Magistrate, Ernakulam as per the provisions of Section 67 and Section 68 of the Act 2003 for solving the issue within one week from the date of receipt of this order". Still aggrieved by the said order, the Appellant has filed the Appeal Petition before this Authority. From the analysis done above and the conclusions arrived at, I take the following decision. In view of the factual position I don’t find any reason to interfere with the findings and decision taken by the CGRF, Ernakulam in this case and hence the order of CGRF No. CGRF–CR/Comp.16/2018-19 dated 29-09-2018 is upheld. The respondent shall take a suitable decision regarding the amount collected from the appellant after obtaining an order from the District Magistrate on this issue. The appeal is found devoid of any merits and hence dismissed. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs.
P/081/2018 - Dr. Shaheen C., Malappuram

Download 
Download
The appellant approached the respondent for shifting an electric pole situated in his property. Since no action was taken in the matter, the appellant approached the CGRF with the request for shifting the pole from his property to the PWD area, which was disposed of by order dated 23-08-2018 as “(1) The respondent shall shift the electric pole situated in the property of the petitioner to the proposed location under deposit work within the stipulated time. (2) The respondent shall consider the request of the petitioner to shift the pole within his property, subject to the feasibility, so as to reduce the expenditure”. Hence this appeal is against the order dated 23-08-2018 of CGRF, Kozhikode, in the OP 46/2018-19, filed before it. From the analysis done above and the conclusions arrived at, I take the following decision. In view of the factual position I don’t find any reason to interfere with the findings and decision taken by the CGRF, Kozhikode in this case and hence the order of CGRF OP No. 46/2018-19 dated 23-08-2018 is upheld. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs.
P/080/2018 - Sri. Jaimon James, Kottayam

Download 
Download
The appellant was a LT consumer who was running a metal crusher industry named Vallithottathil Industries, with consumer number 7820 under Electrical Section, Kidangoor. The electric connection was taken by installing a transformer of capacity 160 kVA under Minimum Guarantee basis valid for 7 years i.e. for the period from 19-11-2009 to 18-11-2016. As per the MG agreement executed by the appellant, he is liable to pay Rs.96032/- (Rupees Ninety six thousand and thirty two only} per annum up to 18-11-2016. Thereafter a new HT connection with transformer of 250 kVA capacity by replacing the 160 kVA was installed at the expenses of the appellant. The appellant had submitted a request on 01-12-2017 for refund of amount after depreciation of 160 kVA transformer which was removed by the Board. The request was rejected by the Deputy Chief Engineer, Pala. This LT connection was dismantled on 09-03-2018 on request from the appellant. Being not satisfied with the decision of the Deputy Chief Engineer, the appellant approached the CGRF, Kottarakkara, with Petition No. OP 80/2018 and the Forum dismissed the petition, vide order dated 14th August 2018. Still not satisfied by the decision of the CGRF, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. Considering the above facts and legal provisions pertaining to the issue this Authority is of the considered view that the petition is not maintainable before this Authority. So, the appeal petition stands dismissed as it is found having no merits. The order of CGRF, Kottarakkara in No. 80/2018 dated 14-08-2018 is upheld. No order as to costs.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday5926
mod_vvisit_counterAll5348588