KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Overview | Search Downloads | Submit file | Up |
Category: Orders | ||
Orders | Files: 1280 | |
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
P-036-2021- Smt. Valsamma George, Thrissur- Order 08-10-2021 |
|
The appellant was issued with the regular bimonthly bill for Rs.26,188/- on 22-10-2020 for an energy consumption of 2977 units. Since the appellant had doubt in the recorded consumption, the meter was sent to TMR Division, Angamaly, a meter testing unit of KSEB Ltd. In the testing it was found that the reason for the exorbitant consumption is earth leakage. The appellant filed a petition in CGRF, Central Region vide OP No. 91/2020-21 and the Forum in its order dated 24-04-2021, dismissed the petition due to lack of merits and the installment facility allowed. The appellant filed this Appeal Petition before this Authority. The energy meter in the premises of the appellant was tested and found good and its errors are within the limits. The “earth load” in the premises was proved with scientific data received from the energy meter and which is within the premises. The quantum of energy recorded in the meter is not consumed by the appellant, but supplied by the Licensee. From the scientific data of the meter, it is seen that the defect started after the reading date 25-08-2020 and detected in the next reading date 22-10-2020. As such, the appellant is liable to remit the bill issued on 22-10-2020. The respondent is directed to prepare a revised bill after deducting the remittance made by the appellant and issue the bill for the balance amount granting two monthly instalments. No interest or surcharge shall be realized from the appellant for the period of petition for orders before the CGRF, Central Region and for the period of appeal petition before this Authority and the due date of the first instalment fixed by the respondent. Since the case is related with leakage of electricity, it is also directed the respondent to exempt the appellant from paying the interest or surcharge for the second instalment also, if the amount is remitted within the due date fixed by the respondent. The appeal petition filed by the appellant is disposed of as above and the decision of CGRF, Central Region in OP No. 91/2020-21 dated 24-04-2021 is modified to this extent. |
P-031-2021- Mother Superior, Palakkad- Order 21-10-2021 |
|
The premises is a self-financing institution and billing of energy charges was done under LT VIA tariff till 30-11-2007. Afterwards the tariff category of the self-financing institution was changed to LT VIIA tariff category and in continuation the subject went to litigation. The appellant was given a short assessment bill for Rs.23,764/- dated 12-10-2020 and hence, the appellant filed a petition in CGRF, Northern Region and as per the order of the Forum, the respondent issued revised bill for Rs.20,159/- on 22-04-2021. Also, the Forum found the respondent’s action based on the direction of the Secretary, KSEB Ltd. vide dated 29-02-2020 is in order. The appellant filed this appeal petition before this Authority. For the reasons detailed above, the appeal petition No: P031/2021 filed by the appellant stands dismissed. The order No. 130/2020-21 dated 26-03-2021 of CGRF, Northern Region, Kozhikode is upheld. |
P-037-2021- Smt. Saritha C Nair, Alappuzha- Order 21-10-2021 |
|
The electric connection was effected on 26-10-2006 for construction purpose with connected load of 5846 watts. The tariff was changed from LT VIF to LT VIIA on 19-01-2018, after the construction works over and functioning as a pharmaceutical premises. The appellant installed solar panels having a capacity of 5 kW on the roof of the building. The complaint pertains to the additional electricity bill for Rs.7,92,331/- issued by the respondent, stating that the CT connection provided to the energy meter was wrong. The wrong connection led to the interchanging of import energy and export energy in the premises. After approaching the officials of the Licensee for the reconsideration of the additional bill, the appellant filed a petition in CGRF, Central Region and the Forum in its order dismissed the petition due to lack of merits. The appellant filed this Appeal Petition before this Authority. The appeal petition filed by the appellant is dismissed. The order of CGRF Central Region, Ernakulam vide OP No: 84/2020-21 dated 24-04-2021 is upheld. |
KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Today | 3649 | |
All | 5365210 |
P/055/2024, Shri.Mujeeb.M |
04-11-2024 |
P/054/2024, Shri.Sunil Kumar |
04-11-2024 |
P0/51/2024, Shri. Joy Joseph |
04-11-2024 |
P/049/2024, Sri. Roy Joseph |
04-11-2024 |
P/052/2024, Shri. Sunil Thomas |
04-11-2024 |
P/053/2024, Shri. K.M Raveendran |
04-11-2024 |
P/050/2024, Shri.G.Isaac |
04-11-2024 |
P/048/2024, Shri.David Saj Mathew & Smt. Aparna M.Babu |
04-11-2024 |
P/030/2024, Shri. Dr. Biju Ramesh |
03-10-2024 |
P/046/2024, Shri. Biji Sony |
03-10-2024 |