KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Overview | Search Downloads | Submit file | Up |
Category: Orders | ||
Orders | Files: 1297 | |
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
P/021/2017 Fr. Edward George Ernakulam |
|
The appellant is a consumer having consumer number 17477 under Electrical Section, Koothattukulam. The appellant is running a private hospital registered under Charitable Trust Act. The appellant was served with a bill dated 28-03-2016 amounting to Rs. 4,96,944/- for the short assessment of wrong fixation of tariff, on the basis of an inspection conducted by the APTS in the premises on 19-03-2016. The appellant filed a complaint in the Section Office which was not allowed. The appellant approached the CGRF, Ernakulam requesting to set aside the short assessment bill issued. The CGRF has dismissed the Petition on finding that the bill issued by the respondent was in order and the petition was found as devoid of any merits, vide its order No. CGRF–CR/Comp.79/2016‐17/501 dated 31-12-2016. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, the appellant has submitted the Appeal petition before this Authority. The order of CGRF, Ernakulam in OP No. CGRF–CR/Comp.79/2016‐ 17/501 dated 31-12-2016 is hereby upheld. Respondent is directed to issue a notice to the appellant as per rules and also issue a fresh bill along with a detailed statement of calculation. The consumer may be allowed sufficient installments, if requested for, but has to pay interest at the rates as per rules, for the installments from the due date of the bill to the day of payment. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. The Appeal Petition filed by the appellant stands disposed of with the decisions ordered as above. No order as to costs. |
P/004/2017 Sri. Arun R Chandran, Ernakulam |
|
The appellant represents M/s Indus Towers Ltd., a company providing passive infra structure service to telecommunication providers. The consumer number of the appellant’s three phase service connection is 19459 with tariff LT VI F which is coming under the jurisdiction of Electrical Section, Kulakkada. The appellant is paying the current charges regularly without any dues or delay. But the respondent as per the invoice dated 21-04-2016 directed the appellant to remit an amount of Rs. 35,376.00 being the short assessment based on the findings that the meter was sluggish during the period from 04/2013 to 07/2013. An objection against the demand was filed before the Assistant Engineer and he rejected the petition without quoting any valid reason or regulations, but revised the short assessment to Rs.14,950.00. So the appellant had approached the Hon’ble CGRF (SR) by filing a petition in OP No. 156/2016. The Forum ordered to quash the short assessment and directed to revise the bill for the meter faulty period based on the meter reading in the succeeding three months after replacement of the faulty meter. Aggrieved against this, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. In view of the above findings the revised short assessment as per the order of CGRF for Rs. 14,950.00 is hereby quashed. The order of CGRF in OP No. 156/2016 dated 30-12-2016 is set aside. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order as to costs. |
P/018/2017 Sri. Arun R Chandran, Ernakulam |
|
The appellant represents M/s Indus Towers Ltd., a company providing passive infra structure service to telecommunication providers. The consumer number of the appellant’s three phase service connection is 9218 with tariff LT VI F which is coming under the jurisdiction of Electrical Section, Cantonment, Kollam. The appellant is paying the current charges regularly without any dues or delay. But the respondent as per the invoice dated 02-02-2016 directed the appellant to remit an amount of Rs. 1,29,338.00 being the short assessment based on the findings that the meter was faulty during the period from 01-01-2014 to 31-07-2014. Even though an objection against the above demand was filed before the Assistant Engineer, he rejected the same without quoting any valid reason or regulations, instead revised the short assessment to Rs. 73,528.00. So the appellant had approached the Hon’ble CGRF (SR) by filing a petition No. 231/2016. The Forum dismissed the petition and directed to remit the short assessment bill. Aggrieved against this, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. In view of the above findings the revised short assessment as per the order of CGRF for Rs. 73,528 is hereby quashed. The order of CGRF in OP No. 231/2016 dated 30-12-2016 is set aside. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order as to costs. |
KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Today | 3582 | |
All | 5601330 |
P/063/2024, Sri. Rajendran .K |
03-01-2025 |
P/064/2024, Sri. Joe.I. Mangaly |
03-01-2025 |
P/082/2024, ശ്രീ.റിയാസ്.ഇ.ആർ |
03-01-2025 |
P/070/2024, ശ്രീ.സ്മിനോജ്.എം.എസ് |
03-01-2025 |
P/069/2024, ശ്രീ.അബ്ദുൾ കരിം സഹറുദ്ദീൻ P.M. |
03-01-2025 |
P/068/2024, ശ്രീമതി.സുകുമാരി.പി |
03-01-2025 |
P/065/2024, ശ്രീമതി. ജോസ്ന കെ.ജെ |
03-01-2025 |
RP/08/2024, Sri. Sunil Thomas |
04-12-2024 |
P/067/2024, Sri. Arun. C |
04-12-2024 |
P/066/2024, Sri. Shajan . N.P |
04-12-2024 |