Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 311 of 427
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1280
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/058/2014 - Sri. Thomas Varghese, Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant is a consumer under Electrical Section, Kizhakkambalam bearing two LT industrial connections, 10388 and 22387. He requested for converting the said LT connections to a single HT connection and remitted the amount of Rs. 2,97,684/- on 04-12-2010 as directed by the respondent for executing the work. On 06-01-2014 the respondent directed the appellant to remit an amount of Rs. 12,40,215/- towards Unconnected Minimum Charges. The appellant approached the CGRF on 31-03-2014 seeking to cancel the UCM charges and to effect HT connection immediately. The Forum accorded an opportunity to both parties to hear the matter. After examining the petition and the statement of facts and considering all the facts and circumstances of the case, the Forum was of the opinion that the respondent had issued notice to the appellant after completing the work on their side. The Forum held that the demand notice dated: 06-01-2014 for Rs. 12,40,215/- was in order and that the respondents are eligible for UCM charges till the appellant avail supply. Aggrieved against the said order, this appeal petition was filed. The demand notice issued by the respondent dated: 06-01-2014 for Rs. 12,40,215/- is quashed.
NO.P/066/2014 - P. Sriram, Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant is the Project Director of Kochi Metro Rail Project of Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC). Their office is having power supply connection with consumer No. 23822 under Electrical Section, Girinagar. According to the appellant, DMRC is a public sector undertaking and electricity is not used for any construction purpose in the office. On 06-04-2013, the appellant submitted an application to change tariff from LT VII A to LT VI B. In spite of repeated requests, the tariff was not changed. Hence the appellant approached the CGRF on 18-06-2014 seeking to change tariff from LT VII A to LT VI B. The Forum, after hearing both parties, held that tariff of LT VII A allotted to the office of the DMRC was in order. Aggrieved against the said order, this appeal petition was filed. The respondent is directed to revise the tariff from LT VII A to LT VI B within a period of two weeks. Due credit may be given to the payments already effected.
No. P/059/2014, Sri K.T. Paul, Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant is an HT industrial consumer with consumer No. LCN 29/6482 under Electrical Section, Kuruppampady. He was made to remit Rs. 5,40,000/- on 03-09-2011 as transmission charges in order to execute the HT agreement to avail the connection with a load of 400 kVA. The appellant approached the CGRF on 31-03-2014 challenging the authority of the respondents to collect such transmission charges. The respondent submitted before the Forum that the Hon’ble High Court, vide judgment dated: 30-06-2014 in WA1042/2013, had upheld the realization of “transmission development charges”. After hearing both parties, the CGRF held that collection of Transmission Development Charges from the appellant was in order. Aggrieved against the said order, this appeal petition was filed. The appeal petition is disposed of as not pressed.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday2016
mod_vvisit_counterAll5363577