Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 2 of 451
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1353
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/032/2025, The Secretary Badiyadka Grama Panchayath

Download 
Download
പരാതിക്കാരൻ ബദിയടുക്ക ഗ്രാമപഞ്ചായത്ത് സെക്രട്ടറിയായ ഈ കേസ് എണിയാർപ്പ് കുടിവെളള വിതരണ സ്കീമിന്റെ കുടിശ്ശികയെക്കുറിച്ചാണ്. ഉപഭോക്തൃ നമ്പർ 1168187013528 ആയ കണക്ഷൻ ബദിയടുക്ക ഗ്രാമപഞ്ചായത്തിന്റെ കീഴിലുളള കുടിവെളള വിതരണ പദ്ധതിയ്ക്ക് വേണ്ടി നൽകിയിട്ടുളളതാണ്. പഞ്ചായത്ത് നടപ്പിലാക്കിയ ഈ കുടിവെളള പദ്ധതിയ്ക്കുളള കറന്റ് ചാർജ് ഉപഭോക്താക്കളിൽ നിന്ന് പഞ്ചായത്ത് ഈടാക്കി KSEBL ന് അടയ്ക്കുകയാണ് ചെയ്തു വന്നിരുന്നത്. എന്നാൽ ഒരു ഉപഭോക്തൃ സമിതിയുണ്ടാക്കുക്കുകയും 2010 ൽ ഈ പദ്ധതി ആ സമിതിയ്ക്ക് കൈമാറ്റം ചെയ്യുകയും ചെയ്തു. 06/2006 മുതൽ 07/2008 വരെയുളള കാലയളവിൽ യഥാസമയം കറന്റ് ചാർജ് അടയ്ക്കാത്തതിനാൽ 2,62,814 രൂപ കുടിശ്ശികയും അതിന്റെ പലിശ 10,38,076/- രൂപയും ചേർത്ത് 13,00,890/- രൂപ ഇപ്പോൾ കുടിശ്ശികയായി കാണുന്നു. ലൈസൻസി ഇത് ഈടാക്കുന്നതിനു വേണ്ടി പഞ്ചായത്തിന് നോട്ടീസ് നൽകിയതിനെ ചോദ്യം ചെയ്തു പഞ്ചായത്ത് CGRF ൽ പരാതി നൽകുകയുണ്ടായി. CGRF നടപടിക്രമങ്ങൾ പൂർത്തിയാക്കി 01/04/2025 ൽ ഉത്തരവിറക്കി. CGRF ന്റെ ഉത്തരവിൽ മേലുളള അപ്പീലായിട്ടാണ് ഇലക്ട്രിസിറ്റി ഓംബുഡ്സ്മാൻ സമക്ഷം ഈ പരാതി സമർപ്പിച്ചിട്ടുളളത്.
P/038/2025, Sri.P.K Gopinathan

Download 
Download
The appellant Shri. P.K Gopinathan is a domestic consumer with consumer no. 1145297009161. The connection is in LT three phase under the Electrical Section Chirayinkeezhu, with connected load 7.280 KW. The connection was initially in the name of his wife Smt.Leena and then transferred to the appellant. The appellant had installed a roof top solar with capacity 10KW and connected to the Licensee’s grid on 2021. Consumer who was billed bimonthly has been changed to monthly billing as the appellant has become a prosumer. Before April 2024, the domestic consumption did not exceed the generation in the solar plant. The appellant is demanding that the payment for excess energy imported to the Grid is to be settled by the Licensee in the same way of they are collecting the energy charges from the consumer. The payment for the excess supplied is not settled in time and making the payments after the delay of many months without interest. In May 2024, the consumption was higher the production in solar plant and the Licensee has realized Rs.11056/- from him. There was banked energy around 6000 units with the Licensee for a period from 01/04/2023 to 31/03/2024, which was un paid while billing during May 2024. The appellant is requesting for the release of excess amount charged for 05/2024 as well as interest for the delayed payment for the banked energy. The appellant had filed the petition to the CGRF and CGRF issued order on 14/03/2024 stating that the petitioner is liable to remit the charges as billed by the Licensee.Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, this appeal petition is filed to this authority.
P/035/2025, Sri.Tony Thomas

Download 
Download
The appellant Shri. Tony Thomas is the Managing Director of Uni Pack (India) Pvt. Ltd. He has availed a HT Service connection for his Industry producing various types of gravels, M-sand etc. under the company named M/s. Unipack(India) Pvt. Ltd. This service connection is under the Electrical Section , Edayar of the Licensee which is under the Electrical Circle Perumbavoor. The appellant was not regular in remitting the current charges. As on 12/05/2025 the total outstanding amount is worked out to Rs. 39,51,044/- including the disputed amount of Rs. 2,47,003/-. The tariff of the consumer is HT 1 (A) with connected load 183.29 KW and contract demand 179 KVA. The consumer filed petition to various fora to delay the payment. The present demand of the petitioner is to quash the bill issued by the Licensee towards disincentive for the power factor correction for Rs.6,12,081/-. This demand notice for the power factor disincentive for a period from 2018-2022, which was in monthly bills. The appellant claimed that he was not aware of the low factor and hence he could not take remedy to improve the power factor. The respondent’s version is that this disincentive was shown in the regular bills. The petitioner filed the petition to CGRF. CGRF issued order dated 25/03/2025 on completing procedure stating that the appellant is liable to pay the arrear and regular bill amount. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, this appeal petition is filed to this authority.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday6082
mod_vvisit_counterAll6836995