Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 323 of 427
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Ascending]
Orders Files: 1280
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P-015/2021-Smt. Kowsalya. K., Kollam-Order 23-07-2021

Download 
Download
Following the inspection of APTS of KSEB Ltd. in the premises of the appellant, the electric supply was disconnected after preparing a site mahazar by the respondent. The respondent issued a penal bill for Rs. 136,047/- stating the reason of “meter tampering” in accordance with Section 126 of the Electricity Act 2003. The appellant approached CDRF, Thiruvanthapuram for compensation and cost, which were allowed by the Forum. The electric supply was reconnected as ordered by the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala. Against the order of CDRF, Thiruvananthapuram the respondent filed appeal petition before Hon’ble SCDC, Thiruvananthapuram, which is under the consideration of Hon’ble Commission. The appeal petition filed by the appellant stands dismissed as it is found not maintainable before this Authority. The order dated 02-02-2021 in OP No. 82/2020 of CGRF, Southern Region is upheld.
P-016/2021-Sri. C.T. Thomas, Pathanamthitta-Order 23-07-2021

Download 
Download
A lot of damages occurred to the electrical equipments connected in the appellant’s premises on 07-06-2020 following voltage fluctuation. The appellant furnished a list of equipments, which were got damaged. On the same incident time KSEB main power supply was interrupted for two hours and took two hours to remove HT line short due to the falling of broken tree branch. The requirement of the appellant is to allow compensation for the revenue loss and also for the pain and sufferings. The appellant filed a petition before CGRF, Southern Region for the above, but the Forum in its order dismissed the petition stating the Forum has no jurisdiction to entertain any petition seeking compensation. This Authority is also not empowered to award any compensation of the damages occurred to the electrical equipments in the premises of the appellant and hence, no need to enter the merit of the case. This Authority upheld the decision taken by the CGRF in OP No. 83/2020 dated 27-02-2021.
P-018/2021-Sri. B.R. Jose, Thrissur-Order 23-07-2021

Download 
Download
A three phase LT electric line is crossing the property of the appellant and the line extends beyond the property and already provided an electric connection from the extended line to one Sri. Praveen Antony. The appellant approached the Licensee for shifting the line from his property and the Executive Engineer intimated the appellant that the line can be shifted under deposit work basis. Further, the appellant filed a petition before CGRF for the same purpose. The respondent prepared two proposals for shifting the line. The CGRF in its order says, “The line shall be shifted on remittance of the estimate amount under deposit work scheme by the petitioner in accordance with Regulation 95 of Electricity Supply Code 2014”. Aggrieved by the decision of the Forum, the appellant filed appeal petition. The appellant’s plea to exempt from remitting the expense for the shifting of the electric line is rejected and this Authority modified the decision taken by the CGRF, Central Region in OP No. 56/2020-21 dated 24-02-2021. The appellant can opt any technically feasible route proposed by the respondent and the appellant shall remit the expense for the shifting of the line.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday3619
mod_vvisit_counterAll5365180