Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 232 of 433
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1297
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/027/2017 Sri. Chndrasekharan, Kollam

Download 
Download
The appellant is a consumer under Electrical Section, Edapallykotta. The complaint of the appellant is that the KSEB officials erected two stay wires in his property without his consent and has caused destruction by way of cutting and removing the branches of mango trees standing without his consent in his property. He also states that the stay wires erected in his property, without his consent, knowledge and caused denial free use of the property and has caused damage to his trees and by this he has suffered a loss of nearly Rs. 5,000/‐. Aggrieved by this, the appellant filed a Petition before the CGRF, Kottarakkara, which was dismissed vide order No. OP/287/2016 dated 13/02/2017, due to lack of merit. Dissatisfied by the order, the appellant preferred this Appeal before this Authority. Rejected the request for the shifting / removing of transformer stays as the existing network in the area comprising of transformers and lines feed the consumers in that area. The removal of the stays will cause the system unstable. The appellant can approach the licensee with a request to shift the stays, if technically feasible, the licensee will take action. Also rejected the request for compensation of Rs. 5,000/- as the respondent arranged the work as per rules. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. The appeal petition filed by the consumer is dismissed. The related CGRF’s order, vide order No. OP/287/2016 dated 13/02/2017, of the CGRF, Kottarakkara, is upheld. No order on costs.
P/035/2017 Sri. Arun R Chandran, Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant represents M/s Indus Towers Ltd., a company providing passive infra structure service to telecommunication providers. The consumer number of the three phase service connection is 17654 under LT VI F tariff and is under the jurisdiction of Electrical Section, Kundara. The appellant is paying the current charges regularly without any due or delay. But the respondent as per the invoice dated 27-07-2016 directed the appellant to remit an amount of Rs. 94,200/- being the short assessment based on the findings that the meter was faulty during the period from 08/2012 to 06/2013. An objection against the demand was filed before the Assistant Engineer on 16-08-2016. He rejected the petition without quoting any valid reason or regulations, and suggested to approach the concerned Forum or Authority after remitting half of the amount assessed or to remit the amount vide letter dated 23-09-2016. So the appellant had approached the Hon’ble CGRF (SR) by filing a petition in OP No. 251/2016. The Forum quashed the impugned bill and directed the respondent to issue the split up bills for the door locked period of 11/2012 and 12/2012 and for the meter faulty period for 03/2013 and 04/2013. Aggrieved against this, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. In view of the above discussions, the issuance of revised short assessment for an amount of Rs. 46,790/- is not sustainable and hence it is hereby quashed. The order of CGRF in OP No. 251/2016 dated 06-03-2017 is set aside. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order as to costs.
P/034/2017 Sri. Arun R Chandran, Ernakulam

Download 
Download
The appellant represents M/s Indus Towers Ltd., a company providing passive infra structure service to telecommunication providers. The consumer number of the three phase service connection is 18942 under LT VI F tariff and is under the jurisdiction of Electrical Section, Kundara. The appellant is paying the current charges regularly without any due or delay. But the respondent as per the invoice dated 27-07-2016 directed the appellant to remit an amount of Rs.52980/- being the short assessment based on the findings that the meter was faulty during the period from 07/2014 to 11/2014. An objection against the demand was filed before the Assistant Engineer on 16-08-2016. He rejected the petition without quoting any valid reason or regulations, and suggested to approach the concerned Forum or Authority after remitting half of the amount assessed or to remit the amount vide letter dated 23-09-2016. So the appellant had approached the Hon’ble CGRF (SR) by filing a petition in OP No. 250/2016. The Forum quashed the impugned bill and directed the respondent to issue a revised bill for the meter faulty period from 09/2014 to 10/2014. Aggrieved against this, the appellant has submitted this appeal petition before this Authority. In view of the above findings, the revised short assessment for Rs. 12,494/- is hereby quashed. The order dated 28-02-2017 of CGRF (SR) in OP No. 250/2016 is set aside. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order as to costs.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday3555
mod_vvisit_counterAll5601303