KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Overview | Search Downloads | Submit file | Up |
Category: Orders | ||
Orders | Files: 1297 | |
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
P/018/2019 - Sri. Subash T.J., Ernakulam |
|
The appellant is a consumer under Electrical Section, Palarivattom having consumer number 25603 under industrial tariff LT IV B with connected load of 19420 watts. A penal bill for Rs. 2,03,780/- was issued to the appellant after an inspection conducted by the APTS, KSEBL on 11-05-2018. It is found in the inspection that the service connection availed for industrial purpose was misused for commercial purposes. The appellant filed a complaint before the CGRF, Ernakulam against the assessment made under Section 126 of Electricity Act 2003. According to the respondent, the matter of the complaint is an assessment under Section 126 of the Act and the CGRF is barred from entertaining such complaints in view of regulation 2 (1) (f) (vii) (1) of the KSERC (CGRF and Electricity Ombudsman) Regulations, 2005. Accordingly the Forum held that it was improper to entertain the complaint and directed the appellant to approach the Appellate Authority, vide order No.44/2018-19 dated 21-02-2019. But without complying the said order of CGRF, this appeal petition was filed before this Authority. From the analysis done and the findings and conclusion arrived at, which are the above, I take the following decision. The appeal petition is rejected as not maintainable. But I am remanding the case to the Assessing Officer, who has to review the case. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. The appeal petition filed by the appellant is disposed of as it is remanded to the Assessing Officer for hearing as directed. No order on costs. |
P/017/2019 - Smt. Maya Vinod, Kollam |
|
The appellant has filed an appeal petition, being aggrieved at the inaction of KSEBL, Electrical Section, Kollam to provide a new LT connection in the premises owned by the appellant. The appeal is against the order dated 06-02-2019 of CGRF, Kottarakkara, in the OP 141/2018 dismissing the complaint due to lack of jurisdiction, filed before it. The matter stands referred to the Additional District Magistrate, Kollam by the respondent. For the reasons detailed above, the appeal Petition No. P/017/2019, filed by the appellant stands dismissed as it is found not maintainable before this Authority. The order dated 06-02-2019 in OP No141/2018 of CGRF, Kottarakkara is upheld. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs. |
P/015/2019 - Sri. K.M. Moideen, Thrissur |
|
The appellant is a domestic consumer bearing consumer number 1075 under Electrical Section, irinjalakkuda No.1. The appellant made a complaint to the Section Office relating the supply failure occurred in the premises due to burning of the fuse. Sri. Anilkumar, lineman was deputed to restore the supply. The allegation of the appellant is that due to personal grudge, the lineman broke open the terminal seal and replaced the fuse with new one. According to the appellant, for replacing the fuse, there is no need to open the terminal seal and the attitude of the lineman reveals nothing but an intentional attempt to implicate the appellant in criminal case alleging theft of energy. The appellant has filed this appeal petition with a request to take disciplinary action against Sri. K.K. Anilkumar, Lineman Gr. II, Electrical Section for misuse of official power. The CGRF, Ernakulam has dismissed the petition filed by the appellant in OP No. 57/2018-19 vide order dated 21-02-2019. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, the appellant has submitted the Appeal petition before this Authority. As this Authority has no power or jurisdiction to take disciplinary action or conduct enquiry against the staff of the licensee who had committed mal practices and negligence, it is held that the appeal petition filed by the appellant is not maintainable and hence dismissed. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. The Appeal Petition filed by the appellant is rejected. The order of CGRF, Northern Region in Petition No. OP/57/2018-19/dated 21-02-2019 is upheld. No order on costs. |
KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Today | 3030 | |
All | 5592053 |
P/063/2024, Sri. Rajendran .K |
03-01-2025 |
P/064/2024, Sri. Joe.I. Mangaly |
03-01-2025 |
P/082/2024, ശ്രീ.റിയാസ്.ഇ.ആർ |
03-01-2025 |
P/070/2024, ശ്രീ.സ്മിനോജ്.എം.എസ് |
03-01-2025 |
P/069/2024, ശ്രീ.അബ്ദുൾ കരിം സഹറുദ്ദീൻ P.M. |
03-01-2025 |
P/068/2024, ശ്രീമതി.സുകുമാരി.പി |
03-01-2025 |
P/065/2024, ശ്രീമതി. ജോസ്ന കെ.ജെ |
03-01-2025 |
RP/08/2024, Sri. Sunil Thomas |
04-12-2024 |
P/067/2024, Sri. Arun. C |
04-12-2024 |
P/066/2024, Sri. Shajan . N.P |
04-12-2024 |