Downloads
Overview Search Downloads Submit file Up
Category: Orders
Page 148 of 422
Order by: Default | Name | Date | Hits | [Descending]
Orders Files: 1265
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman  in pdf format
Files:
P/032/2019 - Sri. Shinoj S., Mavelikkara

Download 
Download
Smt. Sumangi R. Panicker and Smt. Divya S. Panicker, Sumanginilayam are the registered consumers of Electrical Section, Mavelikkara having electric connection with Consumer No. 3878 under LT VI F tariff, consumer number 25064 under LT I A tariff and consumer number 26609 under LT VIIA tariff respectively. The appellant is the husband of Smt. Sumangi R. Panicker. He is aggrieved by the exorbitant electricity bill amounting to Rs. 5,217/- to Consumer No. 3878 and the bill amounting to Rs. 7,806/- to Consumer No. 25064 issued by the respondent and damages occurred to the electrical equipments in the connection No. 26609 (shop) following the shifting of electrical pole near the shop. The appellant approached the CGRF with a complaint against the impugned bills. The CGRF, Ernakulam has dismissed the petition on finding that the subject matter is pending before the Taluk Legal Services Committee, Mavelikkara and before the Electricity Ombudsman. Aggrieved by the decision of CGRF, the appellant has submitted the Appeal petition before this Authority. This Authority is not empowered with the jurisdiction of taking disciplinary action against the licensee’s officials and is not competent to award compensation as per rules and hence these are not considered and not admitted. For the reasons detailed above, the appeal Petition No. P/032/2019, filed by the appellant stands dismissed as it is found not maintainable before this Authority. The order dated 30-03-2019 in OP No. 69/2018 of CGRF, Ernakulam is upheld. Having concluded and decided as above, it is ordered accordingly. No order on costs.
VIEW PETITION No. RP 03/2019 ON APPEAL PETITION No. P/007/2019 - The Assistant Executive Engineer, Wandoor

Download 
Download
The Review Petitioner is the respondent in Appeal No. P/007/2019. The review respondent/appellant is the Managing Partner of M/s. Mubarak Granite Industries, West Chathalloor, Othayi, Edavanna in Malappuram Dt, was having a low tension three phase industrial service connection with consumer number 18078, under Electrical Section, Edavanna, Malappuram. The appellant has complained that the energy meter in his premises is over reading and requested that the same may be tested at TMR Division. The appellant remitted the fee for testing the meter on 12/7/2011 and the meter was tested on 22/10/2011 at TMR Division, Shornur and the test report revealed that the meter was faulty as it showed abnormal pulses on load. The appellant then represented KSEB to refund the overcharged amount from 11/2009 to 10/2011. The KSEB has prepared a calculation statement that an amount of Rs. 15,74,558/- is to be reimbursed to the appellant, as the amount collected during the meter faulty period was in excess. On 31/12/2013, the supply was dismantled due to the upgradation of the electrical connection to High Tension (HT) and thereafter the cash deposit was refunded in January 2014.In the review petition nothing is pointed out which escaped the notice of this Authority while disposing the appeal petition. The review jurisdiction is limited to rectify a mistake or an error which is apparent on the face of records and it cannot be used as appellate jurisdiction. If the review petitioner is aggrieved by the order of this Authority, it is free for him to challenge that order before the appropriate upper authority. In this background, this Authority didn’t find any reason to intervene the order already issued. In view of the above discussions, I hold that review petition is not maintainable and hence rejected.
P/028/2019 - Sri Baburaj, Alappuzha

Download 
Download
The appellant, Sri. Baburaj, Nikarthil House, Panavally, Cherthala is the registered owner of the LT consumer No. 1155142021622 under commercial tariff under Electrical Section, Poochakkal. On the basis of inspection conducted by Kerala State Pollution Control Board, Alappuzha on 04.02.2019 at that premises, Pollution Control Board has ordered to close the peeling shed operated in the building owned by Sri. Baburaj, Nikarthil, Panavally and directed the KSEBL to disconnect the electric supply to the premises vide letter No. PCB/ALP/CG-510/19 dtd 6.02.2019. A disconnection letter dtd 19.02.2019 was sent to the appellant by the Assistant Engineer, Electrical Section, Poochakkal by registered post. Aggrieved against this, the appellant approached the CGRF, Ernakulam. The CGRF in its order dtd. 29.03.2019 held that KSEB Ltd is bound to obey the direction issued by the Environmental Engineer of Kerala State Pollution Control Board to disconnect the supply of the appellant’s premises as per the regulation 138(e) of the Supply Code 2014 and also dismissed the petition submitted by the appellant. The service connection was disconnected on 25.03.2019. Aggrieved by the said order of CGRF, the appellant has filed the Appeal Petition, before this Authority. The appellant’s request in the appeal petition is the restoration of the electric connection. During the hearing the respondent has stated that the electric connection of the appellant in the premises was restored on16-05-2019 following the receipt of sanction from the Pollution Control Board. At present there is no grievance pending in the subject matter. In the above circumstances, the appellant informed that he is not pressing the appeal petition already submitted and withdrawn the case. Since the grievance of the appellant has already been settled, the appeal petition stands disposed of accordingly.
Back

Contact Us

KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488

Any Queries?

Send an email to info@keralaeo.org

Do you Know?

Consumers should submit  petitions to CGRF first before appealing Ombudsman.

Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_counterToday1913
mod_vvisit_counterAll5097965