KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Overview | Search Downloads | Submit file | Up |
Category: Orders | ||
Orders | Files: 1297 | |
Orders of Kerala Electricity Ombudsman in pdf format |
P-027-2021-Sri. Shibu Aboobaker, TVM - Order 08-10-2021 |
|
The appellant additionally requested 800 kVA power to the Licensee and provided after realizing Rs.21.07 lakhs towards the transmission development charges. The required power being supplied from 110 kV Substation, TERLS at a voltage level of 11 kV. Since the power was urgently required, the appellant remitted the entire amount demanded by the Licensee under protest. In continuation, the appellant filed a petition in CGRF, Southern Region seeking refund of the amount remitted and the Forum in its order rejected the petition, observing that the demand notice for remitting the pro-rata amount of Rs.21.07 lakhs issued to the appellant is legal and sustainable. The appellant filed this appeal petition before this Authority. From the analysis done and the findings and conclusions arrived at, the appellant is liable to remit the transmission development charge on pro-rata basis. The appellant had remitted Rs.21.07 lakhs towards the transmission development charge on pro-rata basis for an additional power to the extent of 800 kVA by enhancing the power transformer capacity in the 110 kV Station, TERLS from 25 MVA to 40 MVA. The erection of transformers was not started, but the respondent had initiated action for the procurement of transformers and allied equipment. The infrastructure and certain equipment/materials can be made use for the proposed works. Now the appellant was given the required power for the existing power transformers, but the enhancement of the capacity of the transformer to higher capacity as proposed shall be completed and energized at the earliest, so as to avoid the chances of overloading of the Station. After the capacity enhancement work, the final account of each work, for which amount has been collected by KSEB Ltd. to provide the electric power to the appellant may be prepared and the actual cost estimate be arrived at within three months and the same shall be communicated to the appellant. The order No. OP-87/2020 dated 03-03-2021 of CGRF, Southern Region, Kottarakkara is upheld. The appeal petition filed by the appellant stands disposed of as such. |
P-033-2021- Sri. Johny Joseph, Ernakulam- Order 28-09-2021 |
|
The appellant received two short assessment bills in respect of Consumer number 26631 and 26632 for Rs.3,4261/- and Rs.32,253/- respectively in the month of 12/2020. The period of short-assessment is 08/2017 to 10/2017, stating meter changed on 30-10-2017. The appellant filed petition before CGRF, Central Region and the Forum in its order issued the following :- “(1) The petition is quashed due to lack of merits; (2) The higher Officers of the Licensee may re-examine the period of short assessment bill issued. The appellant filed this appeal petition before this Authority. It is decided to quash the short-assessed bills for Rs.34,261/- in respect of consumer number 26631 and for Rs.32,253/- in respect of consumer number 26632. The Appeal Petition filed by the appellant, stands allowed as above. The order of CGRF, Central Region in OP No: 89/2020-21 dated 17-04-2021 is set aside. |
P-032-2021- Sri. Joseph Mathai, Alappuzha- Order 28-09-2021 |
|
The grievance of the appellant is regarding shifting of a High Tension (HT) line passing over the property of the appellant. The appellant requested the Officers of the Licensee, KSEB Ltd., for the shifting of the line, but finally approached CGRF, Central Region and Forum in its order issued the following :- “(1) The respondent shall furnish the detailed cost for shifting the line as suggested by the petitioner along with details of consents required for the line shifting. On satisfying these demands by the petitioner, the respondent shall arrange the shifting work immediately.” The appellant filed the appeal petition before this Authority. The 11 kV overhead single circuit line passing through the road side and in front of the house of the appellant is not a service connection line, but the line is intended to supply power to various number of consumers. This Authority suggested three proposals for deviating a portion of 11 kV line from the property of the appellant: - (1) The respondent shall look into the possibility of some modifications on the electric poles situated on either side of the disputed portion of the line (Pole No. K/KE/133 and K/KE/134) or inserting an electric pole along the line without creating inconvenience to the appellant or to the road users. If it is feasible, the entire expense for the work as above including material cost and labour charge shall be met by the Licensee. (2) The respondent shall look into the feasibility of converting the Low Tension (LT) line from K/KE/132 to ‘C1’ in the Northern side of the road to 11 kV by shifting the 11 kV electric pole K/KE/133 in the location ‘C’ in the Southern side of the road to ‘C1’ or a convenient location on the Northern side of the road and constructing 11 kV overhead single circuit line from ‘C1’ to pole No: K/KE/134 situated in the location ‘B’ on the Southern side of the road. In brief, the new route of the 11 kV line will be ‘A-B-C1-D’, as per the sketch submitted by the respondent. The appellant shall remit the cost of additional materials required, if any, and the labour charge for the rerouting of the 11 kV line, if the shifting is technically feasible. (3) The respondent shall also look into the technical feasibility of shifting the entire portion of the 11 kV line position ‘A-B-C-D’, in front of the appellant to ‘A-B1-C1-D’ to the Northern side of the road. The appellant shall meet the entire cost of shifting the line towards material, labour etc., if the above proposal is technically feasible. The respondent shall select a technically feasible proposal from the above and intimate the appellant within 30 days from the date of order. The order of CGRF, Central Region in OP No: 81/2020-21 dated 30-03-2021 is modified to this extent. |
KERALA ELECTRICITY OMBUDSMAN
D.H. Road & Foreshore Road Junction,
Near Gandhi Square,
Ernakulam, Kerala-682 016
Ph: 0484 2346488, Mob: 8714356488
Send an email to info@keralaeo.org
Today | 5044 | |
All | 5562253 |
P/063/2024, Sri. Rajendran .K |
03-01-2025 |
P/064/2024, Sri. Joe.I. Mangaly |
03-01-2025 |
P/082/2024, ശ്രീ.റിയാസ്.ഇ.ആർ |
03-01-2025 |
P/070/2024, ശ്രീ.സ്മിനോജ്.എം.എസ് |
03-01-2025 |
P/069/2024, ശ്രീ.അബ്ദുൾ കരിം സഹറുദ്ദീൻ P.M. |
03-01-2025 |
P/068/2024, ശ്രീമതി.സുകുമാരി.പി |
03-01-2025 |
P/065/2024, ശ്രീമതി. ജോസ്ന കെ.ജെ |
03-01-2025 |
RP/08/2024, Sri. Sunil Thomas |
04-12-2024 |
P/067/2024, Sri. Arun. C |
04-12-2024 |
P/066/2024, Sri. Shajan . N.P |
04-12-2024 |